Compensation Lawsuits and Employer's Legal Liability in Workplace Accidents at Sea

INTRODUCTION

Maritime transport and the seafarer profession are, by nature, high-risk endeavors involving high levels of danger, harsh climatic conditions, and confined living spaces. Unlike shore-based employment relationships, a seafarer must remain in the vessel's environment not only during working hours but also during off-shift rest periods. This reality subjects physical and psychological integrity breaches (workplace accidents) occurring in the maritime environment to a distinct legal regime.

In accidents experienced by Turkish seafarers serving on either Turkish-flagged or foreign-flagged vessels, the boundaries of shipowners'/employers' legal liability, the legal nature of this liability, and compensation mechanisms represent some of the most frequently disputed areas in legal practice.

Authored from a Shiprights (Seafarers / Maritime Labor Law) perspective, this article provides a detailed examination of the legal nature of workplace accidents at sea, the employer's duty of care, hazard liability, fault frameworks, types of compensation (material, moral, loss of support), as well as applicable legislation, administrative/judicial procedural steps, and established judicial/doctrinal approaches.

I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND HIERARCHY OF APPLICABLE LEGISLATION

In workplace accidents occurring at sea, evaluating the case based on a single statutory provision is insufficient. Depending on the progression of the incident and the status of the parties, the following statutory hierarchy applies:

1. Maritime Labor Law No. 854 (MLL): The primary legislation governing seafarers working on Turkish-flagged vessels or under Turkish employers. However, because the MLL lacks detailed provisions regarding the definition of workplace accidents and compensation principles, reference is made to general provisions.

2. Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (TCO): Pursuant to TCO Art. 417, the employer is obligated to take all necessary measures to protect the life, health, and physical integrity of the employee. The primary legal bases for compensation liability arising from workplace accidents are TCO Art. 49 (Tort Liability) and TCO Art. 112 (Breach of Contract).

3. Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (TCC) - Maritime Commerce Book: Regulates the seaworthiness and cargoworthiness of the vessel (TCC Arts. 932, 933) and the shipowner’s vicarious liability for the fault of its crew/servants (TCC Art. 1062).

4. Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Law No. 5510: Governs the administrative classification of physical injuries as a "Workplace Accident" (Art. 13) and sets out the principles regarding the deduction (recourse) of benefits paid by the Social Security Institution (SGK) from the overall compensation.

5. International Conventions (MLC 2006, SOLAS, STCW): Safety standards on board, emergency training, medical facilities, and the shipowner's obligation

   to provide financial security (MLC 2006 Standard A4.2) constitute the global minimum standards.

II. NATURE OF WORKPLACE ACCIDENTS AT SEA AND EMPLOYER'S DUTY OF CARE

1. When Does a Workplace Accident at Sea Occur?

Pursuant to Article 13 of Law No. 5510, any event that causes physical or mental disability to a seafarer while on board the vessel, due to work carried out by the employer, or during the navigation of the vessel, constitutes a workplace accident.

Crucial Distinction: Even when off-shift, a seafarer remains under the employer's domain of control throughout their stay in the vessel's environment. Consequently, an accident occurring outside working hours in a cabin, on deck, or during rough seas is legally deemed a workplace accident.

2. Employer's Duty of Care and Fault Liability

The employer must rigorously implement all occupational health and safety measures on board (provision of PPE/Personal Protective Equipment, deck safety, pre-storm lashing/securing checks, etc.).

• Causal Link and Unavoidability: In established jurisprudence, the Court of Cassation assesses whether "all precautions required according to the latest developments in technology and science were taken" when evaluating employer liability. Merely complying with written statutory rules is insufficient; every concrete measure capable of preventing the accident must be implemented.

• Seaworthiness and Cargoworthiness: In accidents resulting from unseaworthiness or unfit condition for the voyage (e.g., failure of crane cables, lack of safety netting, engine breakdown), the shipowner is deemed grossly negligent.

III. TYPES OF COMPENSATION AND CALCULATION PRINCIPLES

In lawsuits filed by a seafarer following a workplace accident at sea—or by surviving dependents in the event of death—the following heads of damage may be claimed:

1. Temporary and Permanent Disability (Material Damages)

For a seafarer injured or disabled as a result of an accident:

• Medical and Treatment Expenses: Healthcare costs, prosthetic/rehabilitation expenses.

• Temporary Disability: Loss of earnings suffered during the recovery period.

• Permanent Disability (Loss of Earning Capacity): Loss of future active and passive earnings calculated based on the disability rating. In maritime practice, when determining the loss of professional earning capacity, a specialized evaluation is conducted taking into account the specific nature of the seafarer's

  work (e.g., loss of a digit/limb by a Chief Engineer or deckhand).

2. Loss of Support Compensation (In Event of Loss of Life)

If a seafarer loses their life due to a vessel sinking, man overboard (MOB) incident in stormy weather, or an onboard accident, the surviving spouse, children, and parents can claim Loss of Support Compensation. Calculations are conducted by experts based on the deceased's probable life expectancy and future income using standard mortality/life tables (PMF 1931 or TRH 2010).

3. Moral (Non-Pecuniary) Damages

This covers distress, grief, and psychological trauma suffered due to the accident. Factors such as limited medical/rescue assistance at sea, helpless waiting periods for helicopters/rescue vessels, and fighting for survival in open waters are taken into consideration by courts to award higher amounts of moral damages.

IV. LEGAL PROCEDURES AND PROCEDURAL STEPS

To prevent loss of rights following a severe workplace accident, the following critical legal steps must be executed:

1.Accident Notification and Scene Documentation:First 48 Hours.

The incident must be immediately reported to the Port Authority, Coast Guard, and Social Security Institution (SGK). Vessel Log Book entries, incident reports, shift rosters, and photographs must be promptly secured.

2.Obtaining Medical and Disability Reports:Treatment Period.

The injured seafarer must obtain a comprehensive medical board report from a fully equipped hospital or the Forensic Medicine Institute establishing the exact percentage of loss of earning capacity.

3.Maritime Liens and Provisional Arrest Application:Security for Claims.

Pursuant to TCC Art. 1320/1-a, seafarers' claims for personal injury arising from workplace accidents constitute "Maritime Claims" (Gemi Alacağı). These claims grant a statutory maritime lien over the vessel. To mitigate the risk of the shipowner evading payment, a Provisional Arrest (İhtiyati Haciz) order can be obtained to detain the vessel from sailing.

4.Direct Claim to P&I Club and Lawsuit:Litigation Phase.

A direct claim is submitted to the shipowner's P&I (Protection & Indemnity) Insurance Club. If an out-of-court settlement cannot be reached, a compensation lawsuit is filed in the competent Labor Courts (or Labor/Commercial Courts in matters involving foreign flags or international elements).

V. CRITICAL LEGAL NUANCES IN LIGHT OF DOCTRINE AND CASE LAW

• Direct Liability of P&I Insurance (Direct Action): As accepted in legal doctrine and MLC 2006 standards, in instances of bodily injury or death, the seafarer or their heirs have the legal right to file a direct claim or lawsuit (Direct Action) against the shipowner's P&I insurer. Even if the shipping company goes bankrupt or ceases operations, the P&I club remains obligated to pay the compensation.

• Excessive Working Hours and Fatigue: Court of Cassation decisions firmly establish that where a seafarer is worked for excessive hours in violation of international STCW and MLC regulations and suffers an accident due to fatigue and loss of concentration, the employer is held to have committed a severe organizational fault, and contributory negligence is generally not attributed to the worker.

• Jurisdiction for Foreign-Flagged Vessels: If a Turkish seafarer was recruited to a foreign-flagged vessel through a Turkish manning agency/intermediary, Turkish Courts possess jurisdiction under private international law (MÖHUK), and Turkish Labor Law provisions may be applied by analogy.

CONCLUSION

Workplace accidents at sea possess a complex legal architecture situated at the intersection of the TCC, MLL, TCO, and international maritime law conventions, setting them apart from shore-based occupational accidents. The fact that a seafarer remains under the full supervision and control of the employer throughout the maritime environment expands the scope of the shipowner's duty of care.

A seafarer's impaired health, lost professional future, or their family's loss of financial support must be fully secured through maritime lien rights under TCC Art. 1320, P&I insurance guarantees, and litigation before Labor Courts. In a legal battle conducted with a Shiprights approach, securing evidence from the outset and applying provisional arrests on the vessel are key to ensuring that compensation is not merely awarded on paper, but actually collected in practice.

Expertise

Specializing in maritime law and legal services

Consultation

Support

info@shiprights.com

+90 553 802 92 64

© 2025. All rights reserved.